Tennessee AG Skrmetti Applauds U.S. District Court Ruling Striking Down Biden-Era HHS Rule on Gender Identity in Healthcare

by | Oct 23, 2025

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti applauded a ruling handed down Wednesday by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi striking down a final rule implemented by the Biden administration’s U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) redefining the Affordable Care Act’s prohibition against discrimination based on “sex” to include “gender identity.”

In May 2024, Skrmetti and Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch led a coalition of 13 other states in filing a lawsuit challenging the HHS rule, which would have required medical providers to perform surgeries and administer hormone drugs to both children and adults for the purpose of gender transition, without regard for a doctor’s medical judgment as to whether that treatment was appropriate.

The rule would also have required medical providers to allow patients into sex-segregated spaces, such as parts of a hospital reserved only for women patients, based on their gender identity rather than their biological sex.

Furthermore, the rule would have mandated that every healthcare worker use gender-affirming pronouns and punish providers for using biologically accurate pronouns.

The rule would have accomplished the new requirements by interpreting Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which is cross-referenced to Title IX, to “prohibit gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination by covered health programs.”

The plaintiff states argued that HHS exceeded its statutory authority by expanding the meaning of “sex” beyond what Congress originally intended in 1972, emphasizing how only Congress, not an executive agency, could redefine such a fundamental term.

On Wednesday, the U.S. District Court agreed with the states, ruling that when Congress enacted Title IX, it “only contemplated biological sex” and, therefore, HHS acted beyond its legal authority by redefining sex discrimination to include gender identity.

The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, meaning the states won without a trial, and denied HHS’s cross-motion to dismiss.

Skrmetti said the court’s decision “restores not just common sense but also constitutional limits on federal overreach” and that he is “proud of the team of excellent attorneys who fought this through to the finish.”

– – –

Kaitlin Housler is a reporter at The Tennessee Star and The Star News Network. Follow Kaitlin on X / Twitter.
Photo “A.G. Jonathan Skrmetti” by A.G. Jonathan Skrmetti

 

 

 

   
This article may be republished only in its entirety and only with proper attribution to State News Foundation.

Written By Kaitlin Housler

Journalist

Related Posts

Don Palmer: Pending Supreme Court Case May Require States to Overhaul Mail-in Ballot Laws

Don Palmer, a senior legal fellow for election integrity with the Heritage Foundation Institute for Constitutional Government, sat down for an exclusive interview Friday with The Tennessee Star’s CEO and Editor-in-Chief Michael Patrick Leahy, where he detailed how a pending U.S. Supreme Court decision could compel several states to overhaul their election laws by requiring mail-in ballots to be received by Election Day.

During an appearance on The Michael Patrick Leahy Show, Palmer discussed election administration, voter confidence, citizenship verification, civic education, and concerns about the federal judiciary.

read more

High School Student Who Has ‘Deep Commitment to Social Justice’ Appointed to Serve on Metro Nashville Public School Board

Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) announced Friday it has selected Hume-Fogg Academic Magnet High School student Hannah Said to serve as the next student member of the Metro Nashville Board of Education, placing a student who has pledged a “deep commitment to social justice” in a prominent advisory role on the district’s governing body.

She succeeds Hannah Nguyen, who graduated from John Overton High School in May.

read more