DOJ Requests SCOTUS Intervene in Case Regarding Flying Alleged Tren de Aragua Members to El Salvador

by | Mar 28, 2025

The DOJ petitioned the United States Supreme Court on Friday to intervene in a decision blocking the Trump administration from using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged criminal illegal immigrants.

On March 15, President Donald Trump used the 1798 law to deport the alleged Tren de Aragua gang members to El Salvador quickly.

“Tren de Aragua (TdA) is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization with thousands of members, many of whom have unlawfully infiltrated the United States and are conducting irregular warfare and undertaking hostile actions against the United States,” the executive order says.

“Pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, consistent with applicable law, apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove every Alien Enemy described in section 1 of this proclamation,” the executive order adds. “The Secretary of Homeland Security retains discretion to apprehend and remove any Alien Enemy under any separate authority.”

The Alien Enemies Act allows the president to deport and detain noncitizens in times of war from hostile countries.

Earlier in March, the Trump administration deported nearly 250 alleged members of TdA to El Salvador.

After this, a lower court blocked the Trump administration from conducting these flights, and this week, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the lower court’s decision.

Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris asked the Supreme Court for “an immediate administrative stay of the district court’s order pending the Court’s consideration of this application.”

A paper written by Rachel Bayefsky, a Virginia Law School associate professor, described an administrative stay as a pause of “legal proceedings until the court can rule on a
party’s request for expedited relief.”

Harris said in the application to vacate the appeal’s court decision that this case “presents fundamental questions” about who conducts “sensitive national-security-related operations” in America.

“The Constitution supplies a clear answer: the President. The republic cannot afford a different choice,” she wrote.

Harris added that Trump’s judgment to remove TdA members “was imperative” to prevent the gang from hurting people in American detention facilities and “continuing to infiltrate U.S. communities.”

“The United States thus has an overwhelming interest in removing these foreign actors whom the President has identified as engaging in ‘irregular warfare’ and ‘hostile actions against the United States,’” she wrote.

Harris said the district court’s decision “rebuffed” Trump’s judgment on how to protect America “against foreign terrorist organizations and risk debilitating effects for delicate foreign negotiations.”

Harris said the Supreme Court “should vacate the district court’s orders.”

– – –

Zachery Schmidt is the digital editor of The Star News Network. Email tips to Zachery at zschmidt1717@gmail.com. Follow Zachery on Twitter @zacheryschmidt2.

 

 

 

   
This article may be republished only in its entirety and only with proper attribution to State News Foundation.

Written By Zachery Schmidt

Journalist

Related Posts

Don Palmer: Pending Supreme Court Case May Require States to Overhaul Mail-in Ballot Laws

Don Palmer, a senior legal fellow for election integrity with the Heritage Foundation Institute for Constitutional Government, sat down for an exclusive interview Friday with The Tennessee Star’s CEO and Editor-in-Chief Michael Patrick Leahy, where he detailed how a pending U.S. Supreme Court decision could compel several states to overhaul their election laws by requiring mail-in ballots to be received by Election Day.

During an appearance on The Michael Patrick Leahy Show, Palmer discussed election administration, voter confidence, citizenship verification, civic education, and concerns about the federal judiciary.

read more

High School Student Who Has ‘Deep Commitment to Social Justice’ Appointed to Serve on Metro Nashville Public School Board

Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) announced Friday it has selected Hume-Fogg Academic Magnet High School student Hannah Said to serve as the next student member of the Metro Nashville Board of Education, placing a student who has pledged a “deep commitment to social justice” in a prominent advisory role on the district’s governing body.

She succeeds Hannah Nguyen, who graduated from John Overton High School in May.

read more